In the past, before I began thinking intellectually and critically about what I was reading, I honestly only read things I could ‘relate’ to – I found comfort, I guess, in narratives about people like me. I am complaining about the depictions of eating disorders and then offering a step towards a solution: go read ‘Hunger’! I have posted about it on Instagram and Twitter. This is why I read ‘Hunger’ – it is not enough for us to sit around complaining that straight, white, thin (in this case, also conventionally pretty anorexic women) are depicted as the norm (in this case, as the face of eating disorders.) We must also look at narratives that challenge this stereotype and then talk about them, too. Why are we ending our pursuit of representation at critiquing that which comes in a white, thin, pretty package? Why aren’t we spending an equal, or even greater, amount of energy engaging with and amplifying those who do challenge that narrative? Ultimately, this quote from Melissa’s piece sticks with me the most: I instead recommend first reading ‘Hunger’ and then reading Melissa’s piece. I am going to try not to restate the same points that Melissa does in her writing, despite having the same mindset, feelings, and opinions, because I am not here to regurgitate her words and information. I took my time because the book was something I needed to experience, not just read. I could have finished it in just one sitting, but I took notes as I read, jotting down my favorite quotes. I devoured the book, finishing it in three sittings. Fabello’s piece Why We Need More ‘Hunger’ And Less ‘To The Bone’ – and it’s no surprise that I decided to opt out of watching ‘To The Bone’ and instead read ‘Hunger.’ I was introduced to the book ‘Hunger’ by Roxane Gay through Melissa A. *If anything I say in this post is phrased problematically or is problematic itself, please let me know so I can learn – I strive to be better and do better always when it comes to body politics and intersectional feminism